Volume 05 - Number 3 - December 1998
Pages: 69 - 119

WASHINGTON’S OBSESSION WITH SEX AND CLINTON 23 AUTHORS LOOK AT CLINTON, LEWINSKY, STARR, AND THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS

Blowers, G. (1998). The most, or least, powerful men in the world. Clio’s Psyche, 5(3), 89-90.

https://doi.org/10.70763/285c595717332b49cfb72d1d48a5a962

The Most, or Least, Powerful Man in the World?

article

Abstract

Geoffrey Blowers argues that although Clinton is called “the most powerful man in the world,” his daily life is tightly managed by advisors, schedules, and constant scrutiny that leave little privacy or autonomy. He interprets the Lewinsky affair as a brief, risky assertion of individual agency and fantasy within an otherwise over-regulated environment. Once exposed, Clinton is again forced into scripted, advised performance under moral investigation—highlighting the paradox of presidential power as lived powerlessness.

Keywords:

balance of power, Bill Clinton, Kenneth Starr, libidinal costs, Monica Lewinsky, moral boundaries, presidential power, psychoanalysis, psychohistory, sublimation, U.S. presidency

President Clinton is the most powerful man in the world. Yet a look at his daily routine poses a serious challenge to this statement. From dawn till dusk his every waking moment is filled with interpersonal tasks in which the power, far from emanating from him, lies with others. He is told what to wear, where to run, whom to meet and what to say. His daily life is bound up in collective forms of decision making, where the balance of power lies more with the other side, even if they be members of his own team advising him. Nominally the most powerful man in the world, in actuality he is so stripped of power that he must virtually ask permission to go to the men’s room (and might seek advice on this for security purposes). Even the spatial arrangements of the White House offices with their myriad doors opening into offices with doors which open into other offices make solitude and privacy near impossible. For him, the desire to initiate actions—any action—must be sublimated into calls for help, advice, suggestion.

Enter Monica. Her story of how she became attracted to Clinton the man is now well known. His is becoming known in fragments, through details he is forced to reveal under various kinds of duress—again, after taking the advice of others. His account is framed largely in terms of a moral fault, a lapse of judgment for which he claims remorse and forgiveness. This is the line taken by those in the media that seek to judge him, and by the Starr investigation that seeks to uncover a strategy of lying for political gain. But none of these accounts deal with that momentary decision whereby he allowed himself to go from being caught up in a stream of fantastic possibilities—when he first found himself becoming enamoured of the charms of the young, adulating, Ms. Lewinsky—to being caught out enacting them.

Embarking upon an affair is a hazardous undertaking. Yet thousands of consenting adults do this each and every day. People’s reasons vary, but in most instances room is inevitably found for maneuver, of time, and place, and occasion. Although many might confess to being moved by the heart, it is the mind that arranges the timetable. A calculus is quickly set to work, juggling weights in an equation of desire that aims to balance, if only transiently, the libidinal costs (of guilt and the fear of being found out), with the returns (of momentary, joyous, illicit pleasures). Ultimately the equation becomes more complex. Other circumstances get factored in; emotional resources are allotted elsewhere. The affair is brought to an end or moves to a different register as people confront their options and exercise choice.

Clinton’s affair on this account is not unusual except insofar as he is ordinarily denied the opportunity to make decisions for himself. When an opportune moment came—albeit with a heavy libidinal investment attached—in the space between adjacent offices, between consultations with informed counsel, he chose to enact a fantasy. This was a unique act in an environment of otherwise assembled engagement. It would have (and properly should have) remained a private experiment. It was clearly short-lived. One suspects his desire was dissipated as much in the act of realizing that such action—carefully engineered under the most difficult of circumstances—was possible, as in the sex itself. This was a desire not frustrated in its aim. In ending the affair with Lewinsky, President Clinton was not indifferent or uncaring but took steps to ensure her continuing welfare and wellbeing. If other forces had not gathered, he might have remained secure in the knowledge that he is capable of the momentary individual act against or in spite of the collective weight of moral exhortation to do otherwise. Perhaps that is clue to where his true Presidential power lies. As it is, he is obliged to mount a daily defense against his critics as his very private affair is subjected to obsessive scrutiny. Once more he is back listening to others, heeding advice, performing on cue. Stripped of power. The most powerful man in the world.

Page 89

About the author

Geoffrey Blowers

Geoffrey H. Blowers, PhD, is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Psychology at the University of Hong Kong and has published papers on the reception of psychology and psychoanalysis in Hong Kong, China, and Japan. He is co-editor with Alison Turtle of a volume of papers on the spread of western psychology in Asia and Oceania, Psychology Moving East (1987) and co-author with Kieron O’Connor of Personal Construct Psychology in the Clinical Context (1996). Blowers may be contacted at <>.

How to cite this article

Blowers, G. (1998). The most, or least, powerful men in the world. Clio’s Psyche, 5(3), 89-90.

https://doi.org/10.70763/285c595717332b49cfb72d1d48a5a962

PDF downloads