Sharing our emotional reactions to the day’s events at the IPA Convention has worked very well over the past 27 years. True, some attendees complain (and don’t come back), but they don’t really believe in studying emotions of groups so nothing is lost. True, sometimes (not often) some people feel insulted briefly, but they say so, and the issue is handled in the group and doesn’t fester. Discussing emotional matters makes a big difference in the group. During all this time, we haven’t split into several groups, we don’t complain in the hallways, and we bring up our differences in the group and usually resolve them there, without the usual group difficulties. Since we discuss lots of upsetting matters in our conventions, that’s an astonishingly successful outcome of our daily group process sessions.

Page 80


Authors:

Lloyd deMause

Lloyd deMause is director of the Institute for Psychohistory, the founding president of the International Psychohistory Association, editor of the Journal of Psychohistory, author or editor of various psychohistory books, and author of “The Evolution of Childhood.” In New York City on January 7, 2007, he will be giving a seminar at the National Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis in Manhattan on the childhood and its evolution. He may be contacted at <>.

How to Cite This:

deMause, L. (2004). Group process is a success. Clio’s Psyche, 11(3), 80. https://doi.org/10.70763/a61f27ab2165df0e18cc9433bd7f27c5

PDF downloads:

Download this Article PDF
Download full Issue PDF

keyboard_arrow_up